Developers using coding agents
Stop watching Claude Code or Codex spend a context window renaming build artifacts. Have it write one task instead, and keep the context for the work that actually needs reasoning.
To rename 500 files, an agent lists the directory, reasons over every name, and emits a tool call per file. The bill grows with the batch. A Disk Tamer task describes the whole job once: the agent writes it, you review it, and a deterministic engine does the work. Same token cost for 5 files or 5,000.
Read the task schema →Stop watching Claude Code or Codex spend a context window renaming build artifacts. Have it write one task instead, and keep the context for the work that actually needs reasoning.
Bulk file work is the least valuable thing an agent can spend tokens on, and the easiest to move off the meter. The cost of a task does not grow with the number of files.
The agent proposes; you approve. You see exactly what will happen, choose the folder yourself, and click Run. Nothing touches your disk until you say so.
A task document is a fixed ~250 tokens regardless of batch size, because it describes the rule rather than the files.
Agent, file by file: 35,000 tokens
One Disk Tamer task: 250 tokens
Roughly 140× fewer.
Estimates, not measurements. Real costs vary by model, filename length, and how often the directory is re-read. Adjust the assumptions above to match what you actually see.